Crash Course on Student Loans
July 16, 2013

Hysterical Headlines

In recent months, student loans have been all over the news. Some recent headlines include:

“Student loan crisis”

“Student loan rates to double”

“Student loan delinquency skyrocketing”

“Are student loans becoming a macroeconomic issue?”

“Lighting the student loan dynamite”

“Yes, there is a student loan bubble”

“College debt bubble mimics housing bubble”

These headlines, and similar ones, can be found by just typing “student loans” into an internet search engine, or by simply picking up your local newspaper. As with any headlines, there is some truth to this very serious issue, but as always, the devil is in the detail, and the student loan situation is no different. Yes, student loan debt outstanding (nearly $1 trillion) is soaring, student loan rates did double (from 3.4% to 6.8%) on July 1, 2013, thanks to inaction from Congress, and student loan debt is larger than auto financing debt ($800 billion), credit card debt ($660 billion), and home equity debt ($550 billion). In addition, delinquency rates for student loan debt (11%) are nearly double the rate for all consumer credit (6%), and nearly $22 billion in student loan debt is “seriously delinquent” (more than 90 days).

However, 85% of student loan debt is guaranteed by the federal government, likely limiting the impact of rising student loan defaults and delinquencies on private credit markets. Congress agreed last week (July 8 – 12, 2013) to tie student loan rates to the yield on 10-year Treasury notes, which, if adopted into law, would push rates back under 4.0% (from 6.8%) for most student loans. Although $1 trillion of student loan debt is a huge number in absolute terms, it pales in comparison to overall (private and public) U.S. debt outstanding ($55 trillion), the mortgage market ($13 trillion), the Treasury market ($12 trillion) and the corporate bond market ($9 trillion). As the economy and especially the labor market continue to improve, the overall delinquency rate on all consumer debt has moved lower from 9% in 2010 to 6% in early 2013. Student loan delinquency rates followed the same pattern in 2010 (around 9%) and 2011 (under 8.5%) before surging to nearly 12%in 2012. They ticked down a bit in the first quarter of 2013.

Know Your Source

One of the main culprits in the hyperbole surrounding the student loan market is that there is not one universally accepted data source on student loans. For example, if you want to know about the state of the U.S. labor market, the universally accepted data source is the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. Similarly, if you want information on gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce is the place to go. On the other hand, there are numerous sources, both public and private sector (and often confusing and conflicting), for student loan data, including, but not limited to:

The Federal Reserve Board of Governors

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York

The College Board

The Congressional Budget Office

Sallie Mae

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The U.S. Department of Education

The Institute for Higher Education Policy

Moody’s

Fitch

Although there are a wide variety of sources for the data, the basic message from all of them is pretty clear. On the surface, the student loan issue is daunting:

Student loans outstanding are closing in on $1 trillion, and they have increased by more than 10% per year on average since 2006.

At 11.2%, the delinquency rates on student loans are rising, and rising rapidly.

The rates on government-backed student loans, while not likely to double, are likely headed higher, making it more difficult for borrowers to repay, and to qualify for other forms of consumer debt (auto and credit card) and for mortgages. This may crimp consumer spending and overall economic growth.

But in our view, the outlook for the student loan issue on the financial system and economy is much more balanced than the rash of recent headlines suggests. An improving economy and labor market—especially for those with a college degree where the unemployment rate is 3.9%, well below the overall unemployment rate of 7.6%—is likely to head off the worst-case scenario of widespread defaults on student loans in the coming years. The risk, however, is that the economy does not improve quickly enough before the onset of the next recession to avert a larger crisis in the next decade or so.

2013-07-16_Student_Loan

_________________________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country’s borders in a specific time period, though GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports less imports that occur within a defined territory.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Member FINRA/SIPC

Watch What the Fed Watches
March 26, 2013

What constitutes a substantial improvement in the labor market?

On Wednesday, March 20, 2013,  Federal  Reserve (Fed) Chairman  Ben Bernanke held the first of four press conferences scheduled for this year at the conclusion of the Federal  Open  Market  Committee’s (FOMC) meetings on March 20, June 19, September 18, and December 18, 2013.  While Bernanke’s Q&A session generated plenty of headlines (and tweets), he really did not say anything the market did not already know about  the Fed’s

view on the economy, the fiscal situation, and more  importantly, on monetary policy, and in particular,  the latest round of bond purchases, quantitative easing (QE3).

Unemployment_Rate_Remains_-_Figure_1

Bernanke did, however, remind market participants of both the benefits:

  • “…putting downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, including mortgage rates” which continues “to provide meaningful support to economic growth and job creation…”

and the costs:

  • “adverse implications of additional purchases for the functioning of securities markets…”
  • “…the potential effects — under  various scenarios — of a larger balance sheet on the Federal  Reserve’s earnings from its asset holdings and, hence, on its remittances to the Treasury.”
  • ”…risks to financial stability, such as might arise if persistently low rates lead some market participants to take on excessive risk in a reach  for yield.”

of continuing QE3. In his prepared remarks just prior to answering reporters’ questions, Bernanke also made a point of reminding markets that the thresholds the Fed has set up for eventually raising rates — unemployment rate below 6.5% and inflation not higher than 2.5% — were not triggers, suggesting that the Fed may wait a while after these thresholds are crossed before raising rates.

What_the_Fed_Says

The first question asked of Bernanke was whether or not the FOMC had spent any time discussing thresholds for ending or changing the pace  of QE3. Bernanke noted that the problem was “complex” but that the FOMC was:

...looking for sustained improvement in a range of key labor market indicators, including obviously payrolls, unemployment rate, but also others like the hiring rate, the claims for unemployment insurance, quit rates,  wage rates,  and so on. We’re looking for sustained improvement across a range of indicators and in a way that’s taking place throughout the economy. And since we’re looking at the outlook, we’re looking at the prospects rather than the current state of the labor market, we’ ll also be looking at things like growth to try to understand whether there’s sufficient momentum in the economy to provide demand for labor going forward.”

The_Private_Sector_-_Figure_2

The list of labor market indicators mentioned by Bernanke was basically the same list cited by Fed Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen — who is a leading candidate to replace Bernanke when his term  as Chairman  ends on January 31, 2014 — in a speech she gave in early March 2013 to the National Association of Business Economists in Washington, D.C. Yellen’s list included:

  • The unemployment rate;
  • Payroll employment;
  • The hiring rate;
  • Layoffs/discharges as a share of total job separations;
  • The “quit” rate as a share of total job separations; and
  • Spending and growth in the economy. Yellen noted specifically that:

I also intend to consider my forecast of the overall pace of when it is not accompanied by sufficiently strong growth, may not indicate a substantial improvement in the labor market outlook. Similarly, a convincing pickup in growth that is expected to be sustained could prompt a determination that the outlook for the labor market had substantially improved even absent any substantial decline at that point in the unemployment rate.”

Companies_Are_Reluctant_-_Figure_3

Essentially, Yellen (who along with being one of the leading candidates to replace Bernanke as Fed chairman, is also at the Fed’s “center of gravity,”

with Bernanke and New York Fed President Bill Dudley) is saying that the

FOMC will need to see strong performance of the labor market AND solid gross domestic product (GDP) growth before it begins to scale back or eliminate QE.

Figures 1 – 5 show the labor market indicators mentioned by Bernanke last week and Yellen in early March.  A quick review of the figures suggests that Yellen and Bernanke — two of the three FOMC members of the “center of gravity” at the Fed — are not yet ready to begin scaling back QE.

LPL_Weekly_Calendar

  • While down  from the peaks seen during the Great Recession of 2008 – 2009,  at 7.8%, the unemployment rate remains well above  the 6.5% threshold for raising rates, and also well above  the 5.5 – 5.75% rate the FOMC forecasts as the new  normal unemployment rate.
  • It is well documented that the private sector economy has created more than 200,000 jobs in four of the past five months. However, the labor market turned in a similar performance in late 2011 and early 2012,  only to see a marked slowdown in job creation over the spring and summer of 2012.  Bernanke mentioned this during his Q&A, noting,  “So I think an important criterion would be not just the improvement (in the labor market) that we’ve seen, but is it going to be sustained for a number of months?”

But_Also_Remain_Somewhat_-_Figure_4

  • At 3.6%, the hiring rate — the level of new  hiring as a percent of total employment measured from the JOLTS data (see box on page5) — remains depressed, and well below the 4.5 – 5.0% hire rate seen prior to the onset of the Great Recession in 2007.  In her March 4, 2013 speech, Yellen noted, “the hiring rate remains depressed. Therefore, going forward,  I would look for an increase in the rate of hiring.”
  • In that same speech, Yellen noted “layoffs and discharges as a share of total employment have already returned to their pre-recession level”. Indeed, Figure 3 shows that the discharge rate,  at 1.2%, is very close to an all-time low. A good proxy for this metric is the level of initial claims and the monthly Challenger layoff data,  both of which continue to show that companies are reluctant to shed more  workers at this point in the business cycle.

Workers_Are_Feeling_More_Confident_-_Figure_5

  • The quit rate measures the percentage of people who leave their jobs voluntarily, presumably because they are confident enough in their own skills — or in the health  of the economy — to find another job. In the three months ending in January 2013 (the latest data available), 53%  of the people who were “separated” from their jobs (laid off, fired, retired, or left voluntarily) were job quitters. This was the highest reading on this metric since mid-2008, but remains well below its pre-Great Recession “normal” of 56 – 60%. Commenting on this metric in her March 4, 2013 speech, Yellen noted “a pickup in the quit rate,  which also remains at a low level, would signal that workers perceive that their chances to be rehired are good — in other  words, that labor demand has strengthened.” The final metrics mentioned by Yellen — consumer spending and overall economic growth — both remain  well below average, and indeed still point to an economy that is running at around  two-thirds speed.

As this document was being prepared for publication on Monday,  March 25, 2013,  Bill Dudley, the third member of the “center of gravity” at the Fed also hinted at his reluctance to remove the stimulus too soon. On balance, Dudley’s comments, along with last week’s appearance from Ben Bernanke echoed comments made in early March 2013 by Fed Vice Chair Yellen, suggest that the “center of gravity” at the Fed is not yet convinced that there has been “substantial improvement” in the labor market or economy. This should give market participants comfort that the Fed is not likely to begin removing QE anytime soon, but also raises the risk that the Fed may wait too long to remove the stimulus, which could lead to higher inflation and higher interest rates in the future.

About the  JOLTS Report

Each month, market participants and the  financial media obsess over the  monthly employment report  from the  Bureau of Labor Statistics ( BLS ) that  details how  many  jobs were added in the  economy, in what  industries the  jobs were added, how  much  workers were paid, and why workers were unemployed. That report  is typically released on the  first Friday of every  month. On the  other  hand,  the  monthly report  on job openings and labor turnover (the JOLTS data), released by the  same government agency — the  BLS — that  releases the  monthly jobs report, is met  with little, if any, fanfare  from the  financial markets or the  financial media. The JOLTS report  does not get  a lot of attention, mainly because it is dated. For example, the  market got detailed information on the  labor market for February  2013  on March  8, 2013  when the  monthly employment report  was released. The JOLTS report  for February  2013  isn’t due  out until April 9, 2013.  The JOLTS data  provide more  insight into the  inner workings of the  labor market than  the  monthly employment report  does. JOLTS provides data  on:

  • The number of job openings by economy-wide, by firm size, and by region;
  • The number of new  hires in a given month; and
  • Job separations, and the various drivers of those separations (fired, laid off, retired, quit).

Please see our Weekly Economic Commentary from February  19, 2013  for more  insights from the  JOLTS report.

____________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations  for any individual. To determine  which investment (s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing.  All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results.  All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The economic forecasts  set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies  promoted will be successful.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within

a country’s borders in a specific time period,  though  GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis. It includes all of private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports less imports that occur within a defined territory.

Government bonds and Treasury Bills are guaranteed by the U.S. government as to the timely payment of principal and interest and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and fixed principal value. However, the value of fund shares is not guaranteed and will fluctuate.

International investing involves special risks, such as currency fluctuation and political instability, and may not be suitable for all investors.

Mortgage Backed Securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment risk that acts much like call risk when you get your principal back sooner than the stated maturity, extension risk, the opposite of prepayment risk, market and interest rate risk.

Quantitative easing is a government monetary policy occasionally used to increase the money supply by buying government securities or other securities from the market. Quantitative easing increases the money supply by flooding financial institutions with capital in an effort to promote increased lending and liquidity.

The Federal Open Market Committee action known as Operation Twist began in 1961. The intent was to flatten the yield curve in order to promote capital inflows and strengthen the dollar. The Fed utilized open market operations to shorten the maturity of public debt in the open market. The action has subsequently been reexamined in isolation and found to have been more effective than originally thought. As a result of this reappraisal, similar action has been suggested as an alternative to quantitative easing by central banks.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), a committee within the Federal Reserve System, is charged under the United States law with overseeing the nation’s open market operations (i.e., the Fed’s buying and selling of United States Treasure securities).

Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.

__________________________________________________________________

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The Chicago Area Purchasing Managers’ Index that is read on a monthly basis to gauge how manufacturing activity is performing. This index is a true snapshot of how manufacturing and corresponding businesses are performing for a given month. A reading of 50 or above is considered a positive reading. Anything below 50 is considered to indicate a decline in activity. Readings of the index have the ability to shift the day’s trading session one way or another based on the results.

Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) is a survey done by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics to help measure job vacancies. It collects data from employers including retailers, manufacturers and different offices each month. Respondents to the survey answer quantitative and qualitative questions about their businesses’  employment, job openings, recruitment, hires and separations. The JOLTS data is published monthly and by region and industry.

__________________________________________________________________

This research  material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

 To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed  | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed  by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit